Archive for June, 2010


Leadership challenge

I got home tonight, ate dinner, watched the end of Law and Order, and was about to drift off to sleep in front of the TV when I heard Sandra Sully’s urgent voice: “Julia Gillard is challenging for the leadership of the Labor Party…”

Clearly I woke up and watched. It’s just, what happened I did not expect this at all. This is exciting. I am excited. I would undoubtedly be more excited if the leadership of the country were being decided in a way that involved ordinary people in any way whatsoever, but it’s still quite an event.

It’s not that I think it will change the policies of the Labor Party very much if at all — I have seen no evidence so far that Gillard has any better ideas than the horror of Rudd’s (probably because until today, she was his loyal sidekick. I guess that was just a ruse, eh.), so it doesn’t really matter to me personally who wins. View full article »

Forrest preaching to the choir

Perth mining billionaire Andrew Forrest addressed 60 Coalition MPs at a private meeting in Canberra, telling them the only way to kill the proposed resources tax was to change the government.1

Somehow, I don’t think this is the best possible venue for Andrew Forrest to do his proselytising.

I mean, I can see the Coalition MPs’ reactions now: “OMG! I was going to vote for Labor in this upcoming election, but that was before Andrew Forrest told me this. I’m going to switch my vote!”

I mean… right?

  1. The Age, ‘PM accused of panic in global crisis‘, 23 June 2010.

Cameron: Britain needs more militarism

I read today in the BBC’s article Cameron wants nation to appreciate armed forces that the UK’s new prime minister thinks Britons should take pride in everything their armed soldiers do. Actually he goes even further than that, and says he wants the military to be front and centre of our national life.

Why not, man? Who wouldn’t want to be proud of a military that is responsible for (plus, I am sure, approximately one billion other things):

  • the brutal beating to death of an Iraqi man, who at the time of death had ninety-three separate injuries [1]
  • the “routine” use of banned “interrogation techniques” [2]
  • secret squads holding prisoners in stress positions, hooding them, and telling them their mothers and sisters will be raped [3]
  • executing prisoners, forcing other prisoners to listen to their deaths, and mutilating Iraqi corpses [4]
  • handing over many, many prisoners to be tortured by Afghan agencies [5]
  • …and Iraqi agencies [6]
  • trashing the homes of Iraqis whose houses they raid [7]
  • participating in the occupations of foreign countries, with all the immorality and abuses that entails (I don’t think you need a source for this one; it’s pretty obvious that the UK’s armed forces occupy foreign countries)

Furthermore, the British military has historically been in all sorts of objectionable endeavours — maintaining and expanding the British Empire, for a start. The British military invented concentration camps, imprisoning 100,000 Boer women and children in them (of which 28,000 died) and meting out even worse treatment to Africans. In the time I spent trying to look for articles about British abuses in Iraq and Afghanistan, I also found articles about abuses longer ago in Kenya and India, and we all know how amazingly well the British treated the Irish (i.e. not).

If Cameron’s going to say the military needs to be at the “front and centre of national life”, just like during the First and Second World Wars (quoth him: In the First World War those at home didn’t just sing ‘keep the home fires burning’, they practised it. In the Second World War, the military occupied a huge place in the national consciousness, partly because everyone knew someone in uniform.) — I assume he supports all of this!

Having the military as the symbol of the nation is screwed up. Let’s celebrate violence and obedience to authority as the most cherished values of our nation, right? Let’s celebrate people whose patriotism goes so far that they torture other people, or kill other people, and let’s celebrate the institutions that, far from condemning this behaviour, do their best to cover this up. And let’s also celebrate an institution that is, lest we forget, completely useless when there’s no war going on, encouraging a situation of permanent war.

Yes Cameron, your prime ministership is certainly off on an excellently humanist note. Now let’s make it even more humanist by celebrating death and torture. Yay!

Hello world!

In the end, it was WordPress 3.0 that did me in.

Yes, I was using Chyrp for a long time. And I liked it too, except for the little niggly bits that I didn’t, and then the project metaphorically died and I realised those niggly bits would never get fixed.

There was also the part where I was getting annoyed with the collection of entries I’d already built up. This may surprise you, especially if you remember how it went down the last time I started a blog afresh. (That is, fairly miserably.) But that’s the way it is. Last time, I guess I felt like there was no reason to “break” the blogs where they broke. There was nothing particularly momentous about April 2008, in my life, that meant it made sense to start the blog over again there. This time, though, I started university, and a lot has changed thanks to that. I think part of the reason I was finding it hard to build momentum was because I didn’t want many of the older entries to still be part of the blog any more.

However, much as I took pleasure in indulging my worrying tendency towards historical revisionism, I did not delete the old blog. I moved it. It is wholly intact at http://jess.skyness.org/old/, for varying definitions of “wholly”, because:

  • The “pretty permalinks” feature broke and I couldn’t fix it, so all the URLs are stuff like jess.skyness.org/old/?action=view&url=university-makes-you-lazy.
  • When Chyrp tries to link to things in the un-pretty manner, it generates broken links for tags for some reason, so don’t try clicking the tags in the sidebar or at the bottoms of entries because you’ll get 404s. You can still see the tag cloud, but no clicking on the tags! Unless you like 404s that is.
  • I couldn’t work out how to set up redirections, so every link to a post on the old blog will be broken. Yes every single one. So far the only way I can work out to fix this is to add a line to my .htaccess for every single entry’s old location, redirecting it to the new one. There must be a way with regex but I couldn’t get it to work for some reason. Maybe I will work a little harder on this later.

Anyway. It is done. This is the new blog, WordPress-based and new and fresh — and very default, but I’m probably about to go on a customisation binge after posting this, so perhaps everything will be shiny and less default by the time someone reads this. It’ll probably still be other people’s themes and other people’s plugins/work generally, but that’s all right for now!

As for how WordPress 3.0 dealt the death blow to the relationship between Chyrp and I?

Mainly, through having support for custom post types. And custom taxonomies. The customisability of Chyrp in that regard was one of the things that most appealed to me about Chyrp, so WordPress rather stole its thunder. Oh, and didn’t have broken links throughout the admin panel (I hope; I haven’t actually checked this yet, but I assume so). It’s also not dead. And there’s all sorts of pluginy and themey goodness for it!

So I’m very sorry Chyrp, but it’s time that you and I parted ways. Adieu.

Powered by WordPress | Hosted by Bubble | Theme: Motion by 85ideas.